FAA Mandates Replacement of Certain Safran PBEs Due to Failure Risk

The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a new Airworthiness Directive (AD) requiring the removal and replacement of certain Protective Breathing Equipment (PBE) units manufactured by a Safran subsidiary. The directive, effective March 12, 2026, addresses a critical aviation safety equipment failure risk where the units may not deliver oxygen to cabin crew during an emergency. This action directly impacts aircraft maintenance procedures and cabin crew safety protocols for operators under FAA jurisdiction.

This AD highlights the potential for a latent manufacturing defect to compromise a crucial line of defense for flight crews during in-flight fire or smoke emergencies. The Safran PBE is designed to supply breathing gas for at least 15 minutes, a critical window for managing such events and ensuring the safety of the aircraft. The potential failure of this equipment could have severe consequences, prompting swift regulatory action from both U.S. and European authorities to mitigate the risk.

Details of the Unsafe Condition

The unsafe condition stems from a manufacturing issue identified in PBEs produced between November 2015 and March 2017. According to regulatory findings, this flaw could prevent the flow of oxygen upon activation, rendering the equipment useless. The problem was first formally addressed by the manufacturer, Safran Aerosystems, in a Service Bulletin (SB 1540F-35-001) issued on December 19, 2025, which provided instructions to address the issue.

Following the manufacturer's bulletin and its own investigation, the FAA determined that an AD was necessary to ensure the unsafe condition was corrected across the fleet. The final rule, published in the Federal Register, prohibits the installation of any affected PBE units onto any aircraft. It also mandates a schedule for the replacement of existing units currently in service, ensuring the removal of all potentially faulty equipment from operation.

International Precedent and Harmonization

The FAA’s action follows a similar mandate from its European counterpart. The European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) had previously identified the same unsafe condition and issued its own directive, EASA AD 2025-0297, which became effective on January 6, 2026. This earlier action required operators under EASA oversight to begin removing and replacing the affected Safran PBEs.

The FAA's decision to issue a corresponding AD reflects a standard practice of regulatory harmonization on global safety issues. When a component manufactured by a major international supplier is found to have a defect, leading civil aviation authorities often coordinate their responses to ensure consistent safety standards for airlines operating worldwide. This prevents a scenario where equipment deemed unsafe in one jurisdiction remains in service in another.

Impact on Airlines and Maintenance Operations

Airlines, repair stations, and other aircraft operators must now conduct a thorough review of their PBE inventory to identify any units falling within the specified manufacturing date range. This involves checking part numbers and manufacturing dates against company records and physical units. Any affected PBEs must be removed from service according to the compliance times laid out in the AD.

The directive's impact is compounded by the equipment's standard service life. According to EASA's directive, the affected PBE models have a life limit of 10 years (120 months) from their date of manufacture. While some of the earliest units produced in late 2015 would be approaching their natural retirement, the AD forces the immediate removal of all affected units, including newer ones from 2017 that would have otherwise remained in service for several more years. This accelerates replacement schedules and may create logistical challenges for operators in sourcing compliant parts.

This situation is a clear example of a component-level manufacturing defect triggering a broad, fleet-wide regulatory action. It underscores the critical importance of quality control and traceability throughout the aviation supply chain.

Why This Matters

This FAA directive reinforces the rigorous oversight applied to all aspects of aviation safety, including cabin emergency equipment. For airlines and maintenance providers, it highlights the operational and financial burden that can arise from supply chain defects and demonstrates the necessity of robust inventory management systems. The coordinated action between the FAA and EASA showcases a global commitment to mitigating shared safety risks, ensuring that critical emergency equipment performs as designed, regardless of where an aircraft operates.

For in-depth airline coverage and commercial aviation news, flying.flights delivers timely industry insights. From aircraft production to supply chains, commercial aviation manufacturing news is covered at flying.flights/manufacturing.