NASA Investigates Public Reaction to Air Taxi Noise in Urban Areas

Initial results from a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) study suggest that public reaction to the noise from future air taxis is complex, with residents of noisy urban environments paradoxically showing more annoyance than those in quieter suburban areas. The research is a critical step in understanding community acceptance, a key barrier to the widespread deployment of Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) vehicles.

The study, named VANGARD (Varied Advanced Air Mobility Noise and Geographic Area Response Difference), aims to fill a crucial knowledge gap for the burgeoning AAM industry. While manufacturers of electric Vertical Takeoff and Landing (eVTOL) aircraft often tout their low decibel levels compared to helicopters, this research underscores that human perception of noise is more nuanced than simple volume measurements. Understanding the psychoacoustic qualities of these new sounds—how their specific pitch, tonality, and character are perceived—is essential for designing aircraft that can operate in populated areas without significant public opposition.

Study Details and Initial Findings

The VANGARD test was conducted from late August through September 2025, involving 359 participants from the Los Angeles, New York City, and Dallas-Fort Worth metropolitan areas. According to NASA, researchers played 67 unique simulated aircraft sounds for the participants to gauge their reactions. The study's preliminary findings indicate that the context of the existing soundscape plays a significant role in how new aircraft noises are perceived.

The counterintuitive result—that those already in loud environments are more bothered by the new sounds—suggests that the difference and novelty of the sound signature may be as important as its absolute volume. This psychoacoustic element is central to NASA's work in the sector.

“With air taxis coming soon, we need to understand how people will react to a variety of future aircraft sounds,” said Sidd Krishnamurthy, lead researcher at NASA's Langley Research Center. “This test filled a critical gap, and its results will improve how we predict human reactions to noise, guiding the design and operation of future aircraft.”

Broader Industry Context on AAM Noise

The findings from the VANGARD study align with broader industry trends that identify noise as a primary hurdle for Urban Air Mobility (UAM), a subset of AAM. While a study by the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) found that 83% of respondents had a positive overall perception of UAM, it also identified noise as the second-most cited concern, trailing only safety. Similarly, an earlier Airbus study highlighted sound type (49.3%) and sound volume (48.8%) as top community concerns.

Manufacturers are actively working to quantify and mitigate these concerns. A 2022 NASA test with a Joby Aviation eVTOL aircraft, for example, measured its noise at just 45.2 dB from a distance of 400 meters while flying at 100 knots—a level comparable to a quiet conversation. However, the VANGARD results show that decibels alone do not determine community acceptance.

Implications and Next Steps

The data gathered from the VANGARD study will be used to refine computational models that predict human responses to AAM noise. These improved models will allow aircraft designers and urban planners to better anticipate the acoustic impact of new flight routes and vehicle designs, potentially shaping everything from propeller blade shapes to designated flight corridors. The full results will be detailed in a future NASA technical publication.

Industry trends suggest that initial AAM operations will likely focus on services for the public good, such as medical transport, to help build community support before expanding into commercial passenger services. An EASA survey supports this strategy, showing that use cases benefiting the community are more widely supported than those for private needs. NASA's research provides the foundational data needed to ensure that as this new mode of transportation develops, it does so in harmony with the communities it aims to serve.

Why This Matters

In my view, this research confirms a long-held suspicion in aerospace acoustics: it's not just about being quiet, it's about sounding right. The success of the entire AAM market hinges less on the engineering feat of electric flight and more on the psychoacoustic challenge of integrating novel sounds into an already dense urban soundscape. NASA's focus on human perception, rather than just decibels, is the correct approach and provides the foundational data that manufacturers and regulators desperately need to avoid a public backlash before the first air taxi even takes off.

Stay ahead of the airline industry with commercial aviation news from flying.flights. Get the latest updates on major hubs, regional terminals, and airport operations via the Airports section at flying.flights/airports.