NTSB Reveals Broken Part in Fatal UPS MD-11 Crash Failed Four Times Before

Ujjwal SukhwaniByUjjwal Sukhwani3 min read
Share
SAFETYNTSB Reveals Broken Part in Fatal UPS MD-11 Crash Failed Four Times Before
NTSB's factual report on the November 2025 UPS MD-11 crash revealed a critical engine mount part that failed was documented by Boeing to have failed four times previously, raising questions about maintenance and safety warnings.

Key Points

  • 1The NTSB's factual report confirmed the MD-11's engine separated due to a fractured spherical bearing race, which showed extensive fatigue cracking.
  • 2Boeing had documented four previous failures of this exact part on three MD-11s in a 2011 service letter, but did not classify it as a "safety of flight condition."
  • 3The 34-year-old aircraft was compliant with its maintenance schedule, with its next detailed inspection not due for nearly 7,000 more flight cycles, leading to scrutiny of the maintenance intervals.
  • 4The FAA issued an Emergency Airworthiness Directive grounding all MD-11 and related DC-10 aircraft following the November 2025 accident.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) released a factual report on the fatal UPS MD-11 crash.

This update focuses on a critical part failure. The left engine separated shortly after takeoff. This event occurred in November 2025 in Louisville, Kentucky. The plane was departing Louisville’s Muhammad Ali International Airport.

Investigators are focused on a key aircraft engine mount component. This part helps secure the MD-11’s engine to the wing. Its failure led to the catastrophic engine separation failure.

The Engine Mount Failure

The NTSB found the part broken into two pieces. The component is called the spherical bearing race. It is housed in the pylon aft mount bulkhead. Investigators found evidence of fatigue cracking in the bearing race. The lugs holding the part were also cracked. Metallurgical analysis showed fatigue accounted for 75% of the fracture. The rest was consistent with overstress failure. The 34-year-old MD-11 only reached 30 feet of altitude. It then crashed into industrial buildings. Three pilots and 12 people on the ground were killed.

Maintenance Schedule Adequacy Questioned

Cracks in the engine mount parts went undetected. They were not caught during regular maintenance. The last detailed inspection was in October 2021. The plane was not due for another check. It still had roughly 7,000 cycles remaining. This raises questions about the maintenance schedule adequacy. Aviation safety experts are reviewing the inspection intervals.

History of Warnings and Service Letters

The NTSB factual report detailed a significant history. Boeing, which bought McDonnell Douglas, knew of the issue. The manufacturer documented four prior failures of the same part. These failures occurred on three different MD-11 planes. This information was included in a 2011 Boeing service letter.

At that time, Boeing did not believe the failure threatened safety. The company “determined it would not result in a safety of flight condition.” The service letter recommended a visual inspection. It also suggested installing a redesigned part. However, it did not require these actions.

The DC-10 Precedent

This finding contrasts with earlier regulatory action. The MD-11 is the successor to the McDonnell Douglas DC-10. The crash is reminiscent of a 1979 DC-10 accident. That crash also involved a left engine separation. It led to 273 fatalities and a worldwide grounding of the DC-10 fleet.

Former FAA and NTSB investigator Jeff Guzzetti commented on the issue. He noted a 1980 McDonnell Douglas service bulletin. That bulletin did identify the spherical bearing race failure as a “safety of flight condition.” Guzzetti stated this raises questions. It concerns the severity of the 2011 Boeing warning. It also questions how UPS acted on that information.

Regulatory and Fleet Impact

Following the crash, the FAA acted swiftly. It issued an FAA Emergency Airworthiness Directive. This directive grounded all MD-11s and related DC-10s. This grounding affects major cargo carriers. The investigation is ongoing. The ultimate conclusion will come in the NTSB’s final report. This report is expected more than a year after the crash.

  • Key Focus: Investigators are analyzing the failure of the bearing. They are also reviewing the maintenance history.
  • Industry Response: Boeing, UPS, and the FAA declined comment on the report. They cited the ongoing NTSB investigation. Both the manufacturer and the airline expressed condolences. UPS spokesperson Jim Mayer said the company remains “profoundly saddened.” They are focused on the recovery effort.

For more updates on commercial aviation news, visit [flying.flights].

Topics

Aviation SafetyNTSB InvestigationUPS AirlinesBoeing MD-11Aircraft MaintenanceEngine Separation
Share
Ujjwal Sukhwani

Written by

Ujjwal Sukhwani

Aviation News Editor & Industry Analyst delivering clear coverage for a worldwide audience.

View Profile

You Might Also Like

Discover more aviation news based on similar topics

FAA Mandates Stricter Safety Standards for Regional Airlines: What Changes Now?
REGULATORY
Yesterday4 min read

FAA Mandates Stricter Safety Standards for Regional Airlines: What Changes Now?

The FAA approved stricter safety standards for regional airlines, enhancing pilot training and aircraft maintenance to address recent commercial aviation safety concerns.

Ryanair Boeing 737-800 Engine Pod Strike Undetected for 24 Hours at Faro
SAFETY
Jan 7, 20263 min read

Ryanair Boeing 737-800 Engine Pod Strike Undetected for 24 Hours at Faro

Ryanair Boeing 737-800 suffered an engine pod strike landing at Faro, with the significant damage reportedly going undetected for approximately 24 hours.

DGCA Issues Notice to Air India Over Boeing 787 Dreamliner Snags
SAFETY
Jan 1, 20262 min read

DGCA Issues Notice to Air India Over Boeing 787 Dreamliner Snags

DGCA issued a show-cause notice to Air India for allegedly operating a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner on June 28 despite repetitive technical snags and non-compliance with the Minimum

Air Canada Flight AC1502 Returns After Baggage Handler Trapped in Cargo Hold
SAFETY
6 hours ago3 min read

Air Canada Flight AC1502 Returns After Baggage Handler Trapped in Cargo Hold

Air Canada flight AC1502 returned to the gate at Toronto Pearson after passengers heard screams, discovering a baggage handler trapped in the cargo hold, prompting a safety review.

What New Software Upgrade Did EASA Certify for the Boeing 737 MAX?
REGULATORY
Yesterday3 min read

What New Software Upgrade Did EASA Certify for the Boeing 737 MAX?

EASA certified a new software update for the Boeing 737 MAX, addressing remaining safety concerns and enhancing flight control systems for global fleet operations.

United Airlines Faces Lawsuit After 737 Technician Fired During Cancer Treatment
BUSINESS
Just now4 min read

United Airlines Faces Lawsuit After 737 Technician Fired During Cancer Treatment

United Airlines faces a federal lawsuit from a 737 aircraft technician who alleges he was wrongfully terminated during a chemotherapy session, violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.