Delta 737 Engine Failure Forces Emergency Return, Sparks Runway Fire in Savannah

A Delta Air Lines flight experienced a significant engine failure shortly after takeoff from Georgia, forcing an immediate return to the departure airport and igniting a grass fire along the runway. The incident involved Delta flight 1067, a Boeing 737-900 operating a short-haul service from Savannah/Hilton Head International Airport (SAV) to Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport (ATL) on a Sunday evening.

The flight crew declared an emergency moments after departure when the aircraft's left engine failed. The event highlights the effectiveness of crew training in managing critical in-flight emergencies and the vital role of airport emergency services in mitigating ground-based risks. All 179 passengers and six crew members returned to the gate safely, with no injuries reported.

Incident Timeline and Response

Delta flight 1067 departed from Savannah at approximately 6:45 p.m. local time. Shortly after becoming airborne, the flight crew reported a problem with the left engine. Air traffic controllers in the tower observed a large flame emanating from the engine during the takeoff roll. Audio recordings confirmed the pilot's communication: “We lost left engine straight out here for Delta 1067.”

The engine failure expelled debris and ignited the dry grass adjacent to the runway, creating what one controller described as the “whole taxiway is on fire.” The immediate response involved diverting other aircraft and dispatching Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting (ARFF) units to extinguish the blaze. The flight crew successfully managed the aircraft on a single engine and performed an emergency landing back at SAV less than 30 minutes after its initial departure.

In a statement, Delta Air Lines (DL) confirmed the event, citing a “mechanical issue with the aircraft’s left engine.” The airline stated, “The Boeing 737-900 landed safely and was met by [Aircraft Rescue and Firefighting], then customers deplaned normally at the gate. The safety of our customers and crew is our highest priority. We apologize to our customers for this delay in their travels.”

One passenger, Jeanne Miraglia, described hearing a “loud boom” during ascent. She recounted the pilot's calm communication, which informed passengers that an engine had failed but assured them of their safety, preparing them for the sight of emergency vehicles upon landing.

Operational Impact and Recovery

The immediate operational impact included the temporary closure of the affected runway while ARFF crews contained the grass fire. Passengers from flight 1067 were deplaned and accommodated in the terminal. Delta Air Lines arranged for a replacement aircraft to complete the journey to Atlanta. The passengers ultimately arrived at ATL just after 3 a.m. the following morning, experiencing a significant delay but avoiding injury.

The incident aircraft, a Boeing 737-900, will undergo a thorough inspection by Delta's technical operations teams to determine the root cause of the engine failure. Such events typically trigger an investigation by the airline and may also be subject to review by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). The NTSB is the primary U.S. government agency responsible for investigating significant transportation accidents, including in-flight engine failures and fires on commercial aircraft.

Broader Context and Safety Protocols

While dramatic, uncontained engine failures are rare in modern commercial aviation due to high standards of engine design, manufacturing, and maintenance. Aircraft like the Boeing 737 are certified to fly safely on a single engine, and flight crews undergo extensive and recurrent training to manage these specific scenarios. The response of the DL 1067 crew demonstrates the successful application of these established emergency procedures.

The incident also underscores the importance of airport-based ARFF services. Their rapid and effective response prevented the runway-side grass fire from escalating into a larger threat to airport infrastructure or other operations. The seamless coordination between the flight crew, air traffic control, and ground-based emergency services was critical to the safe resolution of the event.

Why This Matters

This incident serves as a practical validation of modern aviation safety protocols. It demonstrates that redundant aircraft systems, rigorous pilot training for single-engine operations, and coordinated airport emergency responses are effective in protecting passengers and crew during critical mechanical failures. For the industry, it reinforces the importance of continuous maintenance oversight and may provide valuable data for engine manufacturers and regulatory bodies during subsequent investigations.

Visit flying.flights for the latest commercial aviation news and airline industry updates. Get the latest updates on major hubs, regional terminals, and airport operations via the Airports section at flying.flights/airports.