How Did a 100-Ton Weight Error Cause the LATAM Boeing 777 Milan Tail Strike?
Aviation News Editor & Industry Analyst delivering clear coverage for a worldwide audience.
Italian authority ANSV concluded a LATAM Boeing 777-300ER's Milan tail strike was caused by a 100-tonne pilot weight miscalculation, highlighting procedural failures.
Key Takeaways
- •100-tonne (100,000 kg) weight miscalculation was the sole cause of the LATAM Boeing 777 tail strike at Milan Malpensa in July 2024.
- •The error stemmed from a pilot incorrectly subtracting taxi fuel, leading to a takeoff weight of 228.8 tonnes instead of the correct 328.4 tonnes.
- •Procedural failures, specifically the crew's shared use of the incorrect data, caused the cross-check to fail, resulting in invalid V-speeds and insufficient thrust.
- •The Italian ANSV reclassified the event as an accident, emphasizing the need for improved human factors training and data verification protocols.
The Italian National Agency for the Safety of Flight (ANSV) released its final report. It detailed the cause of a serious accident involving a LATAM Airlines Boeing 777-300ER. The aircraft sustained a severe tail strike during takeoff from Milan Malpensa Airport (MXP) on July 9, 2024. Investigators determined the root cause was a catastrophic 100-tonne weight miscalculation. This human error led to incorrect takeoff performance data.
The 100-Tonne Miscalculation
The accident involved LATAM flight LA8073, bound for São Paulo, Brazil. The investigation found a 100-tonne discrepancy in the calculated takeoff weight. The correct weight was 328.4 tonnes (328,425 kg). However, the crew used an incorrect figure of 228.8 tonnes.
This significant pilot performance calculation error originated during pre-flight preparation. A line-training captain mistakenly subtracted the expected taxi fuel from the gross weight. This arithmetic error resulted in the massive weight underestimate. The incorrect figure was then verbally announced and entered into the Electronic Flight Bags (EFBs) by both pilots.
Procedural Failures and Cross-Check Breakdown
The investigation highlighted a breakdown in standard operating procedures. Because both pilots used the same erroneous figure, the required cross-check failed to catch the mistake. The crew did not independently validate the entered data against the official load sheet. This turned the independent check into a shared single point of failure.
- The incorrect weight led to invalid V-speeds (V1, VR, V2).
- Calculated rotation speed (VR) was far too low for the aircraft's actual mass.
- The crew continued the takeoff despite a "V-speeds unavailable" warning.
- The aircraft's tail contacted the runway during rotation.
The Boeing 777-300ER dragged its tail for 723 meters on the runway. The damage caused the event to be reclassified from a serious incident to an accident. The aircraft became airborne and later returned safely to Milan Malpensa (MXP) after dumping fuel. No injuries were reported among the 398 people on board.
Industry Impact and Safety Lessons
The ANSV investigation final report underscores the critical nature of aviation safety human factors. It shows how a simple arithmetic error can cascade through automated systems. The incident highlights the need for robust cross-checking and crew situational awareness.
Authorities like the ANSV and international bodies will use these findings. They will inform future operational guidance and pilot training. The event serves as a stark reminder for all airlines, including LATAM Airlines, about data verification. It stresses that technology must be paired with rigorous procedural adherence to ensure safety. The case also raises questions about EFB design and how it can better prevent such a significant takeoff performance data error.
flying.flights provides comprehensive commercial aviation news covering airlines, aircraft, and airports. For detailed airline coverage, route changes, and fleet moves, explore the Airlines section at flying.flights/airlines.

Written by Ujjwal Sukhwani
Aviation News Editor & Industry Analyst delivering clear coverage for a worldwide audience. Covers flight operations, safety regulations, and market trends with expert analysis.
Visit ProfileYou Might Also Like
Discover more aviation news based on similar topics
FAA Mandates Replacement of Certain Safran PBEs Due to Failure Risk
The FAA has issued an airworthiness directive mandating the replacement of certain Safran PBEs due to a manufacturing flaw that can block oxygen flow.
GCAA Suspends Two Controllers After Loss of Separation Incident in Guyana
Guyana's GCAA has suspended two air traffic controllers after a United and Turpial Airlines flight came within five miles, half the required separation.
American Airlines 737 MAX Shows Bullet Holes After Colombia Flight
Colombian authorities are investigating an American Airlines 737 MAX after bullet holes were found post-flight in Miami, likely from its landing in Medellín.
Air India Sees Technical Incidents Spike Fourfold in January
Air India recorded a fourfold rise in technical incidents to 1.09 per 1,000 flights in January, prompting intensified regulatory scrutiny and new inspections.
AOG Technics Founder Jailed for Global Fake Aircraft Parts Fraud
AOG Technics founder Jose Yrala was jailed for selling 60,000 fake jet-engine parts, causing nearly £40 million in damages to the global airline industry.
Airlines Resume Puerto Vallarta Flights as Jalisco Security Stabilizes
Mexican authorities report Jalisco security has stabilized, allowing airlines to resume flights to Puerto Vallarta and Guadalajara after cartel violence.