Military Anti-Drone Laser Prompts El Paso Airspace Closure
Aviation News Editor & Industry Analyst delivering clear coverage for a worldwide audience.
A military anti-drone laser deployment over El Paso, Texas prompted an FAA airspace closure, sparking lawmaker criticism of interagency mismanagement.
Key Takeaways
- •Triggered an FAA airspace closure over El Paso after a military anti-drone laser was deployed.
- •Exposed significant communication failures between the Pentagon and FAA on C-UAS operations.
- •Prompted sharp criticism from lawmakers who questioned the official narrative and cited mismanagement.
- •Occurred amid a high volume of laser-on-aircraft incidents, with 10,994 reported nationally in 2025.
The deployment of a military high-energy laser over Texas prompted the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to issue a Temporary Flight Restriction (TFR), briefly closing airspace around El Paso. This US drone laser incident has ignited criticism from lawmakers regarding mismanagement and a lack of coordination between the Pentagon and civil aviation authorities. The event highlights the growing challenges of integrating military Counter-Unmanned Aircraft System (C-UAS) technologies within the National Airspace System.
The TFR for El Paso was initially planned for a 10-day period but was rescinded after only a few hours. A second, separate TFR was later issued for Fort Hancock, approximately 50 miles away. The disruption stemmed from what a joint statement from the Pentagon, FAA, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) described as an engagement to "mitigate a seemingly threatening unmanned aerial system operating within military airspace." However, the official narrative has been challenged, with some reports suggesting the target may have been a mylar party balloon rather than a cartel drone.
Interagency Mismanagement and Political Fallout
The incident has drawn sharp criticism for what lawmakers describe as a failure of communication between government agencies. U.S. Rep. Gabe Vasquez of New Mexico called the event a "botched operation, miscommunication at the highest levels," asserting there was "never an immediate threat to the public."
Echoing these concerns, U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar of Texas stated that the administration's explanation did not align with her understanding of the events. "The statement by the administration that this shutdown was linked to a Mexican cartel drone that came into U.S. airspace — that is not my understanding," she said. "The information coming from the administration does not add up."
The conflict underscores a critical gap in protocols for deploying advanced military systems, such as the U.S. Army's Directed Energy Maneuver-Short Range Air Defense (DE M-SHORAD) system, in proximity to civilian flight operations. The DE M-SHORAD is a prototype that mounts a 50-kilowatt class laser on a Stryker vehicle designed to counter drones, rockets, and mortars.
Broader Context of Laser-Related Aviation Risks
While this event involved a military-grade directed energy weapon, it occurs against a backdrop of persistently high reports of laser strikes on aircraft from ground-based sources. According to a February 2026 FAA report, pilots reported 10,994 laser strikes in 2025. While this represents a 14% decrease from the record high of 13,304 incidents in 2023, the figures remain a significant safety concern for the agency. The FAA can impose civil penalties of up to $11,000 per violation for shining a laser at an aircraft.
Texas registered the second-highest number of incidents in the nation in 2025, with 1,100 reported strikes. The FAA continues to campaign against the misuse of handheld lasers, which can temporarily blind pilots during critical phases of flight. The official FAA data on laser strikes highlights the ongoing danger posed to aviation safety.
The El Paso incident introduces a new dimension to this risk, involving authorized, high-power systems where the primary danger lies not in malicious intent but in procedural and coordination failures between the Department of Defense (DoD) and the FAA.
What Comes Next
The fallout from the El Paso airspace closure is expected to trigger a comprehensive review of the protocols governing the testing and deployment of C-UAS technologies near civilian infrastructure. Lawmakers will likely press for greater transparency from the DoD and FAA regarding the incident and demand the establishment of clearer, more robust deconfliction procedures. The event will almost certainly influence future regulations for integrating directed energy systems into domestic security operations, with a focus on preventing unintentional disruptions to civil aviation.
Why This Matters
This incident serves as a critical case study on the friction between national security imperatives and civil aviation safety. As C-UAS technology becomes more prevalent to counter drone threats, this event underscores the urgent need for seamless interagency coordination and strict operational protocols. The resolution of this issue will set a precedent for how the U.S. government manages the use of advanced military systems within its own domestic airspace.
From airline operations to fleet updates, commercial aviation news lives at flying.flights. Follow aviation sustainability efforts, emissions research, and green initiatives in the Environmental section at flying.flights/environmental.

Written by Ujjwal Sukhwani
Aviation News Editor & Industry Analyst delivering clear coverage for a worldwide audience. Covers flight operations, safety regulations, and market trends with expert analysis.
Visit Profile