NASA Classifies Boeing Starliner Failure as a Type A Mishap

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has officially classified the troubled Boeing CST-100 Starliner mission as a Type A Mishap, the agency's most severe failure designation. The classification follows a comprehensive investigation into the June 5, 2024, Crewed Flight Test which experienced multiple thruster failures and left two astronauts temporarily stranded aboard the International Space Station (ISS). This Boeing Starliner failure represents a significant setback for both the manufacturer and NASA's Commercial Crew Program (CCP).

A Type A Mishap classification is reserved for events causing over $2 million in property damage, the loss of a crewed vehicle, or a fatality. According to NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman, the Starliner incident exceeded this cost threshold by a factor of over 100. The formal designation triggers the highest level of scrutiny and requires an independent investigation, the results of which were detailed in a 312-page report that highlighted systemic issues with engineering, management, and government contractor accountability.

Investigation Reveals Deep-Seated Failures

The investigation report paints a picture of a program beset by technical and cultural problems. A key finding was that NASA, in its desire to secure a second U.S. launch provider alongside SpaceX, allowed design compromises and did not fully understand the extent of inadequate hardware qualifications. Isaacman stated that as development progressed, NASA's insight into Boeing's processes proved insufficient, leading to overlooked technical faults on prior test flights.

The report also points to failures in NASA Boeing oversight. The space agency is said to have placed excessive trust in Boeing to manage its own engineering and supply chain, while Boeing failed to apply sufficient scrutiny to its subcontractors. This lack of layered oversight created an environment where problems could go unaddressed. "Starliner has design and engineering deficiencies that must be corrected, but the most troubling failure revealed by this investigation is not hardware," Isaacman stated in a press conference. "It's decision making and leadership that, if left unchecked, could create a culture incompatible with human space flight."

Internal disagreements further complicated the mission while astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams remained on the ISS. Isaacman admitted that "disagreements over crew return options deteriorated into unprofessional conduct while the crew remained on orbit," revealing severe friction within the joint NASA-Boeing mission control team.

Commercial Crew Program Context

NASA's Commercial Crew Program, established in 2010, was designed to foster private industry development of spacecraft to transport astronauts to the ISS, ending U.S. reliance on Russian Soyuz vehicles. A core goal was to ensure launch redundancy with at least two independent American providers. To date, Boeing's CCP contract is valued at $4.2 billion, compared to SpaceX's $2.6 billion contract for its successful Crew Dragon vehicle.

The Starliner program's persistent delays and the severity of this failure call the viability of Boeing as a secondary provider into question. The investigation's findings align with a broader industry trend of increased scrutiny of contractor oversight, suggesting NASA may need to shift from a model of 'insight' to more direct 'oversight' on critical human spaceflight programs. The classification and its underlying causes are detailed in NASA's official procedural documents, specifically NPR 8621.1, which governs mishap investigations.

What Comes Next

Despite the scathing report, NASA has indicated it will not abandon the Starliner program. The agency remains committed to having a second crew launch provider to ensure redundant access to the ISS. However, the project will move forward in a significantly reduced capacity until Boeing can fully address the engineering and cultural deficiencies identified in the investigation.

Boeing must now implement a comprehensive corrective action plan subject to rigorous NASA approval before any future crewed flights are considered. A specific timeline for these fixes and a potential next flight has not been disclosed. The focus will be on resolving the thruster issues, improving software verification, and overhauling management processes to ensure a culture of safety and transparency.

Why This Matters

This Type A Mishap designation is more than a label for a single failed mission; it is a critical assessment of the public-private partnership model for human spaceflight. The incident exposes deep-rooted cultural and oversight issues at both Boeing and NASA, threatening the core CCP goal of having two reliable American crew transport systems. For the aerospace industry, it serves as a stark reminder that even with legacy contractors, rigorous government oversight and internal accountability are paramount to ensuring spacecraft safety.

Visit flying.flights for the latest commercial aviation news and airline industry updates. For airline finances, mergers, and industry strategy, visit the Business category at flying.flights/business.