NASA Faults Boeing, Self in Damning Starliner Mishap Report
Aviation News Editor & Industry Analyst delivering clear coverage for a worldwide audience.
NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman has faulted both Boeing and internal leadership for the Starliner mission failure, now officially a "Type A mishap."
Key Takeaways
- •Classifies Starliner's first crewed mission as a 'Type A mishap' due to safety risks and over $200 million in damages.
- •Faults both Boeing leadership and internal NASA oversight for mission failures that stranded two astronauts for 93 days.
- •Highlights a history of technical issues, including thruster failures on the crewed flight and a failed 2019 uncrewed test.
- •Confirms Starliner's future flights are on hold pending significant corrective actions, leaving SpaceX as the sole U.S. crew provider.
In a formal report released February 19, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has officially classified Boeing's first Starliner crewed mission as a "Type A mishap," the agency's most severe safety designation. NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman publicly faulted both Boeing's leadership and NASA's own management for the failures during the Starliner Crew Flight Test (CFT) that put two astronauts at risk and stranded them on the International Space Station (ISS) for an extended period.
The classification signals a profound crisis for the Starliner program, placing it in the same category as catastrophic events like the Challenger and Columbia space shuttle disasters. The decision follows a lengthy investigation into the June 2024 mission, which encountered multiple thruster failures and other technical issues that jeopardized the safety of astronauts Butch Wilmore and Sunita Williams. This public rebuke from NASA's highest level puts significant pressure on Boeing to implement comprehensive technical and cultural reforms before the spacecraft is permitted to fly again.
A 'Type A Mishap' Declared
The Starliner CFT mission, which launched on June 5, 2024, was plagued by problems that nearly prevented it from docking with the ISS. According to NASA's 312-page report, the issues were severe enough to warrant the "Type A mishap" classification. Per NASA Procedural Requirements, this designation is reserved for mission failures involving property damage of $2 million or more, or the loss of a crewed spacecraft. The agency confirmed the financial damage from the Starliner incident exceeded $200 million, a hundred times the minimum threshold.
Due to the spacecraft's technical problems, astronauts Wilmore and Williams remained on the ISS for 93 days. The Starliner capsule was ultimately deemed unsafe for their return, and the pair were brought back to Earth aboard a SpaceX Crew Dragon in March 2025. The empty Starliner capsule returned uncrewed in September 2024. NASA Associate Administrator Amit Kshatriya acknowledged the severity of the situation, stating, "We almost did have a really terrible day," referring to the potential loss of the crew. Speaking of Wilmore and Williams, he added, "We failed them."
Leadership and Cultural Failures
Administrator Isaacman, who assumed leadership of NASA in December 2025, did not limit his criticism to technical faults. He cited poor decision-making and a flawed workplace culture at both Boeing and within NASA's own oversight teams. "While Boeing built Starliner, NASA accepted it and launched two astronauts to space," Isaacman stated. "We have to own our mistakes and ensure they never happen again."
Isaacman asserted that the mission should have been labeled a serious mishap from the beginning, suggesting there was internal pressure to protect the program's schedule and Boeing's involvement. This reflects concerns that lessons from past space disasters involving cultural and leadership failures had not been fully integrated. "This is just about doing the right thing," Isaacman said. "This is about getting the record straight."
A History of Starliner Challenges
The troubled CFT mission was not an isolated incident for the Starliner program. Boeing's first uncrewed Orbital Flight Test (OFT-1) in December 2019 failed to reach the ISS due to a mission timer anomaly, forcing the company to repeat the flight. The second attempt also encountered issues.
These persistent challenges stand in stark contrast to the success of SpaceX, the other contractor in NASA's Commercial Crew Program. NASA awarded the contracts in September 2014 to develop private astronaut transportation, ending U.S. reliance on Russian Soyuz rockets. Boeing's contract was valued at up to $4.2 billion, while SpaceX's was valued at $2.6 billion. Since 2020, SpaceX has successfully launched 13 crewed missions to the ISS for NASA, leaving Boeing far behind schedule and performance targets. Under the program's fixed-price contracting model, Boeing has absorbed over $2 billion in cost overruns for Starliner development.
The Path Forward
Boeing's path to certifying Starliner for regular crew rotation flights is now uncertain. There is no set date for its next mission, which is planned to be an uncrewed supply run to the ISS to serve as another test flight. In a statement, Boeing said it "has made substantial progress on corrective actions for technical challenges we encountered and driven significant cultural changes across the team."
The timeline is critical, as NASA plans to retire the ISS in 2030 and transition to commercially operated space stations. Until Starliner is certified, SpaceX remains the sole U.S. provider for crewed launches to the station.
Why This Matters
This public condemnation from NASA's leadership represents a critical juncture for Boeing's space division, already under scrutiny for issues in its commercial aircraft unit. The findings raise fundamental questions about NASA's contractor oversight model and its ability to manage complex, high-stakes public-private partnerships. For the U.S. space program, the continued grounding of Starliner underscores a lack of redundancy in crew transportation, increasing reliance on a single provider as the ISS nears the end of its operational life.
Visit flying.flights for the latest commercial aviation news and airline industry updates. For detailed airline coverage, route changes, and fleet moves, explore the Airlines section at flying.flights/airlines.

Written by Ujjwal Sukhwani
Aviation News Editor & Industry Analyst delivering clear coverage for a worldwide audience. Covers flight operations, safety regulations, and market trends with expert analysis.
Visit ProfileYou Might Also Like
Discover more aviation news based on similar topics
FAA Mandates Replacement of Certain Safran PBEs Due to Failure Risk
The FAA has issued an airworthiness directive mandating the replacement of certain Safran PBEs due to a manufacturing flaw that can block oxygen flow.
GCAA Suspends Two Controllers After Loss of Separation Incident in Guyana
Guyana's GCAA has suspended two air traffic controllers after a United and Turpial Airlines flight came within five miles, half the required separation.
American Airlines 737 MAX Shows Bullet Holes After Colombia Flight
Colombian authorities are investigating an American Airlines 737 MAX after bullet holes were found post-flight in Miami, likely from its landing in Medellín.
Air India Sees Technical Incidents Spike Fourfold in January
Air India recorded a fourfold rise in technical incidents to 1.09 per 1,000 flights in January, prompting intensified regulatory scrutiny and new inspections.
AOG Technics Founder Jailed for Global Fake Aircraft Parts Fraud
AOG Technics founder Jose Yrala was jailed for selling 60,000 fake jet-engine parts, causing nearly £40 million in damages to the global airline industry.
Airlines Resume Puerto Vallarta Flights as Jalisco Security Stabilizes
Mexican authorities report Jalisco security has stabilized, allowing airlines to resume flights to Puerto Vallarta and Guadalajara after cartel violence.