Portland Fuel Hub Faces Pressure to Accelerate Seismic Risk Reduction Plan
Key Points
- 1Portland city staff proposed a 20% reduction in fuel storage capacity at the Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub (CEIH) by 2036 to mitigate catastrophic seismic risks.
- 2Community activists are demanding immediate implementation of the drawdown, arguing the 10-year delay is unacceptable given the threat of a Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake.
- 3The CEIH, which stores crude oil, diesel, and aviation fuels in over 400 tanks, supplies more than 90% of Oregon's total fuel requirements.
- 4Debate centers on data accuracy, with activists citing state data suggesting tanks are only 40% utilized, allowing for a much stricter and immediate capacity reduction than the city's proposal.
The City of Portland’s proposal to implement a 20% reduction in fuel storage capacity at the Critical Energy Infrastructure Hub (CEIH) by 2036 has ignited a dispute with community and environmental advocates who argue the timeline is dangerously slow. The CEIH, a six-mile stretch along the Willamette River, houses over 400 aging tanks owned by eleven companies and handles more than 90% of Oregon’s total fuel supply, including significant volumes of aviation fuels, crude oil, and diesel. The conflict came to a head at a recent Planning Commission hearing where city staff outlined the decade-long plan.
Multiple seismic risk assessments confirm that the CEIH is highly vulnerable to liquefaction during a major Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake, potentially leading to catastrophic spills and explosions. City staff justified the 2036 deadline by noting it aligns with the state-mandated timeline for companies to complete seismic tank upgrades monitored by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Furthermore, officials estimate the 10-year window is necessary for companies to reconfigure remaining capacity without disrupting fuel supply reliability.
Activists, including tribal representatives and neighborhood groups, strongly criticized the lack of interim requirements and demanded the drawdown begin immediately upon policy adoption. Opponents argue that the city's 20% target—based on federal data showing tanks are 70% full on average—is too conservative. They presented state fire marshal data indicating that tanks are only 40% utilized on average, suggesting a much stricter and immediate capacity reduction is feasible. The Planning Commission will discuss the proposals during work sessions in early 2026 before voting on a final recommendation to the City Council.
Topics
You Might Also Like
Discover more aviation news based on similar topics
IATA warns SAF production growth is slowing, urges policy correction
IATA warns sustainable aviation fuel production growth is slowing, urging policymakers to correct course on mandates.
Mitiga Airport Fuel Capacity Doubles to 760,000 Liters, Boosting Tripoli Air
Brega Oil Marketing Company is significantly expanding Mitiga Airport's aviation fuel depot capacity from 360,000 to 760,000 litres to enhance supply for
Never Miss Critical Aviation Updates
Get the top aviation stories delivered to your inbox every morning