Will the FAA Mandate 25-Hour Cockpit Voice Recorders for New Aircraft?
Key Points
- 1FAA's Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) seeks to increase the CVR recording time from 2 hours to 25 hours for newly manufactured aircraft.
- 2The proposal aligns U.S. standards with those already required by ICAO and EASA for large aircraft manufactured since January 2021.
- 3The NTSB has cited at least 14 investigations since 2018 where critical CVR data was overwritten due to the current two-hour limit.
- 4The separate FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024 requires a final rule by 2027 and mandates retrofitting existing fleets by 2030.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has proposed a significant rule change. This new proposal would standardize the cockpit voice recorder duration for all newly manufactured aircraft in the United States. The goal is to increase the minimum recording time from the current two hours to 25 hours.
This move is part of a broader effort to enhance aviation safety investigation capabilities. It would ensure accident investigators have more complete data following an incident or accident.
Background on the Proposed Rule
The FAA published a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) outlining the change. The current U.S. regulation requires cockpit voice recorders (CVRs) to retain only the last two hours of audio data. After this time, the oldest information is continuously overwritten.
This two-hour limit has repeatedly hampered the National Transportation Safety Board's (NTSB) work. The NTSB reports that at least 14 investigations since 2018 were negatively impacted because CVR data was overwritten. Important audio information was lost before the device could be secured.
In response, the NTSB issued Safety Recommendation A-18-030. This recommendation urged the FAA to require the extended recording duration. The FAA's proposal directly addresses this key NTSB safety recommendation.
Alignment with Global Standards
This proposed rule brings U.S. standards in line with international aviation regulations. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and the European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) already mandate the 25-hour CVR duration.
Specifically, EASA and ICAO require 25-hour CVRs for large aircraft manufactured after January 1, 2021. These are typically aircraft with a maximum takeoff weight over 27,000 kg (about 60,000 lbs). The FAA 25-hour CVR rule would apply to all newly manufactured aircraft required to carry a CVR under existing operating rules.
Industry Impact and Challenges
Retrofitting Existing Fleets
The FAA's NPRM focuses only on newly manufactured aircraft. It does not include a requirement to retrofit the existing U.S. fleet. This omission drew criticism from the NTSB. The NTSB noted that without a retrofit mandate, critical data would still be lost for years. The service life of commercial airplanes can exceed 40 years.
However, a separate legislative action, the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2024, does address this. The Act requires the FAA to issue a final rule by 2027. This final rule must include a provision to retrofit existing aircraft with 25-hour CVRs by 2030. This sets a clear aircraft retrofit deadline for airlines.
Cost and Pilot Concerns
The FAA estimates the cost of upgrading to a 25-hour CVR on a new aircraft to be up to approximately $4,500 per unit. This is considered a minimal increase for a significant safety benefit.
Pilot groups, such as the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), support the longer recording time for investigative purposes. However, they emphasize the need for pilot data protection. ALPA has called for guaranteed protections to ensure CVR recordings are not misused. Specifically, they want to prevent the use of this data for administrative or disciplinary proceedings against flight crews.
- The FAA 25-hour CVR rule is a direct response to NTSB concerns over lost data.
- The new CVRs will use solid-state memory, which is more resistant to shock and can include a battery backup.
- The extended duration is essential for long-haul flights and incidents that occur hours before the final landing.
- This regulatory change is a major step toward global harmonization of international aviation regulations.
For in-depth airline coverage and commercial aviation news, flying.flights delivers timely industry insights.
Topics
Written by
Ujjwal SukhwaniAviation News Editor & Industry Analyst delivering clear coverage for a worldwide audience.
View ProfileYou Might Also Like
Discover more aviation news based on similar topics
Did an FAA Notice Warn Pilots of Slackline Before Fatal Arizona Crash?
The FAA issued a Notice to Air Missions (NOTAM) warning of a slackline a week before a fatal Arizona helicopter crash, prompting an NTSB investigation.
What Caused the Boeing 777 Engine Failure on a Transatlantic Flight?
Aviation regulators have launched an investigation into a Boeing 777 engine failure that forced a transatlantic flight to make an emergency landing with no reported injuries.
Why Is the FAA Investigating a Boeing 737 MAX Rudder Control Anomaly?
The FAA has launched a safety probe into the Boeing 737 MAX rudder control system following a minor flight anomaly reported by Southwest Airlines.
Will the FAA Mandate More Comprehensive Pilot Mental Health Screenings?
The FAA has updated its guidance for pilot medical certification, streamlining the process for uncomplicated mental health conditions while requiring comprehensive screening for high-risk cases.
FAA Rejects Mandatory Learjet Inspection After Fatal Scottsdale Crash
The NTSB urged the FAA to mandate inspections for certain Learjet models after a fatal crash at Scottsdale Airport, but the FAA rejected the airworthiness directive.
How 2025's American Airlines, Air India Tragedies Tested Global Aviation Safety
American Airlines, Air India, and UPS tragedies, coupled with a 43-day ATC shutdown, made 2025 a turbulent year for global aviation safety and operations.